Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. (2003). Planning for teaching statistics through problem solving. In R. Charles & H. L. Schoen (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving : Grades 6-12 (pp. 105-117). Reston, VA : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Learning to reason about distribution. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 147-168). Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Kluwer.
Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon : Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93 (4), 373-397.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. (1996). Reform by the book : What is - or might be - the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform ? Educational Researcher, 25 (9), 6-8, 14.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners : Towards a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession : Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Biehler, R. (1993). Software tools and mathematics education : The case of statistics. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning from computers : Mathematics education and technology (pp. 68-100). Berlin : Springer.
Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform : Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools. Educational Psychologist, 35 (3), 149 - 164.
Brown, C. A., Stein, M. K., & Forman, E. A. (1996). Assisting teachers and students to reform the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 63-93.
Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation : Contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17 (2), 5-12.
Clement, J., & Brown, D. E. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning : Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction. Instructional Science, 18, 327-361.
Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical learning : The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 5-44.
Cobb, P. (2002). Reasoning with tools and inscriptions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 187-216.
Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2004). Proposed design principles for the teaching and learning of elementary statistics. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 375-396). Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Kluwer.
Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 1-78.
Cobb, P., & Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 83 – 94.
Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 113-164.
Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31, 175-190.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Confrey, J., Bell, K., & Carrejo, D. (2001, April). Systemic crossfire : What implementation research reveals about urban reform in mathematics. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Seattle.
Davydov, V. V. (1988). Problems of developmental teaching (Part I). Soviet Education, 30 (8), 6-97.
Davydov, V. V. (1995). The influence of L. S. Vygotsky on education theory, research, and practice. Educational Researcher, 24 (3).
Davydov, V. V., & Radzikhovskii, L. A. (1985). Vygetsky’s theory and the activity-oriented approach in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition : Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 35-65). New York : Cambridge University Press.
de Abreu, G. (2000). Relationships between macro and micro socio-cultural contexts : Implications for the study of interactions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 1-29.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley : University of California Press.
deLange, J., van Reeuwijk, M., Burrill, G., & Romberg, T. A. (1993). Learning and testing mathematics in context. The Case : Data Visualization. Madison, WI : University of Wisconsin, National Center for Research in Mathematical Sciences Education.
Dewey, J. (1951/1981). Experience and nature : A reintroduction. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey : The later works 1925-1953 (Vol. 1, pp. 361-364). Carbondale, IL : Southern Illinois University Press.
Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1979). Individual and collective conflicts of centrations in cognitive development. European Journal of Psychology, 9, 105-108.
Dörfler, W. (2000). Means for meaning. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms : Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 99-132). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency ? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962-1023.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Remillard, J. (1996). Perspectives on learning to teach. In F. Murray (Ed.), The Teacher Educator’s Handbook (pp. 63-91). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change : A follow-up study of teachers’ professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653-689.
Freudenthal, H. (1971). Geometry between the devil and the deep sea. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3, 413-435.
Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Reidel.
Gamoran, A., Anderson, C. W., Quiroz, P. A., Secada, W. G., Williams, T., & Ashman, S. (2003). Transforming teaching in math and science : How schools and districts can support change. New York : Teachers College Press.
Gamoran, A., Secada, W. G., & Marrett, C. B. (2000). The organizational context of teaching and learning : Changing theoretical perspectives. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of sociology of education (pp. 37-63). New York : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Gravemeijer, K. (1990). Context problems and realistic mathematics instruction. In K. Gravemeijer, M. van den Heuvel & L. Streefland (Eds.), Contexts, free productions, tests, and geometry in realistic mathmatics education (pp. 10-32). Utrecht, The Netherlands : OW & OC Research Group.
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, The Netherlands : CD-ß Press.
Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 155-177.
Gravemeijer, K., Cobb, P., Bowers, J. S., & Whitenack, J. W. (2000). Symbolizing, modeling, and instructional design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms : Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 225 – 274). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
Hancock, C., Kaput, J. J., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1992). Authentic inquiry with data : Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Pyschologist, 27, 337-364.
Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
Konold, C., & Higgins, T. (2002). Working with data : Highlights related to research. In S. J. Russell, D. Schifter & V. Bastable (Eds.), Developing mathematical ideas : Collecting, representing, and analyzing data. Parsippany, NJ : Dale Seymour Publications.
Konold, C., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., & Gagnon, A. (1997). Students’analyzing data : Research of critical barriers. In J. B. Garfield & G. Burrill (Eds.), Research on the role of technology in teaching and learning statistics : Proceedings of the 1996 International Association for Statistics Education Roundtable Conference (pp. 151-167). Voorburg, The Netherlands : International Statistics Institute.
Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT : Yale University.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning : Legitimate peripheral participation. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Lehrer, R., & Romberg, T. (1996). Exploring children’s data modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 69-108.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2000). Symbolizing, communicating, and mathematizing : Key components of models and modeling. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms : Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 364-381). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
Masingila, J. (1994). Mathematics practice in carpet laying. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 25, 430-462.
McClain, K. (2002). Teacher’s and students’ understanding : The role of tools and inscriptions in supporting effective communication. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 217-249.
McClain, K., Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2000). Supporting students’ ways of reasoning about data. In M. Burke (Ed.), Learning mathematics for a new century (2001 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) (pp. 174-187). Reston, VA : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
McGatha, M., Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2002). An analysis of students’ initial statistical understandings : Developing a conjectured learning trajectory. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16, 339-355.
Nelson, B. C. (1999). Building new knowledge by thinking : How administrators can learn what they need to know about mathematics education reform. Cambridge, MA : Educational Development Center.
Noss, R., Pozzi, S., & Hoyles, C. (1999). Touching epistemologies : Meanings of average and variation in nursing practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40 (1), 25-51.
Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. E. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding : How can we characterize it and how can we represent it ? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 61-86.
Prawat, R. S. (1995). Misreading Dewey : Reform, projects, and the language game. Educational Researcher, 24 (7), 13-22.
Presmeg, N. C. (1997). Reasoning with metaphors and metonygmies in mathematics learning. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning : Analogies, metaphors, and images. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
Roth, W. M. (1997). Where is the context in contextual word problems ? Mathematical practices and products in grade 8 students’ answers to story problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 487-527.
Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control : Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. In C. Cazden (Ed.), Review of Educational Research (Vol. 16, pp. 353-389). Washington, DC : American Educational Research.
Saxe, G. B. (1994). Studying cognitive development in sociocultural context : The development of a practice-based approach. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 135-157.
Schifter, D. (1995). Teachers’ changing conceptions of the nature of mathematics : enactment in the classroom. In B. Nelson (Ed.), Inquiry and the development of teaching : Issues in the transformation of mathematics teaching (pp. 17-25). Newton, MA : Center for the Development of Teaching, Education Development Center.
Senger, E. (1999). Reflective reform in mathematics : The recursive nature of teacher change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 199-201.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions : Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36.
Sfard, A. (1994, September). The development of the concept of concept development : From God’s eye view to what can be seen with the mind’s eye. Paper presented at the The Symposium on Trends and Perspectives in Mathematics Education, Klagenfart, Austria.
Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 77, 20-26.
Smith, J. P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling : A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 387-402.
Steffe, L. P. (1983). The teaching experiment methodology in a constructivist research program. In M. Zweng, T. Green, J. Kilpatrick, H. Pollak & M. Suydam (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 469-471). Boston : Birkhauser.
Steffe, L. P., & Kieren, T. E. (1994). Radical constructivism and mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 711-733.
Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology : Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-307). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. A. (1997). Teacher learning in a social context : Integrating collaborative and institutional processes with the study of teacher change. In E. Fennema & B. Scott Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 155-192). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York : Free Press.
Streefland, L. (1991). Fractions in realistic mathematics education. A paradigm of developmental research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Kluwer.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R. A., Thompson, P. W., & Boyd, B. A. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In 1994 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 79-92). Reston, VA : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Thompson, A. G., & Thompson, P. W. (1996). Talking about rates conceptually, part II : Mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 2-24.
Thompson, P. W. (1992). Notations, principles, and constraints : Contributions to the effective use of concrete manipulatives in elementary mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 123-147.
Thompson, P. W., & Saldanha, L. A. (2000). Epistemological analyses of mathematical ideas : A research methodology. In M. Fernandez (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 403-407). Columbus, OH : ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions : A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction - The Wiskobas Project. Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Reidel.
van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky : A quest for synthesis. Cambridge, MA : Blackwell.
van Oers, B. (1996). Learning mathematics as meaningful activity. In P. Nesher, L. P. Steffe, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 91-114). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
Varenne, H., & McDermott, R. (1998). Successful failure : The schools that America builds. Boulder, CO : Westview.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of Vygotsky, L. S. (vol.1) : Problems of general psychology. New York : Plenum.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York : Oxford University Press.
Westbrook, R. B. (1991). John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Washington, DC : Association for Curriculum and Supervision.
Wilensky, U. (1997). What is normal anyway ? Therapy for epistemological anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 171-202.